I've written Haskell for 10+ years and I can honestly say that there are very few areas where I would seriously consider Haskell over Rust at this point. It als

I've written Haskell for 10+ years and I can honestly say that there are very few areas where I would seriously consider Haskell over Rust at this point. It also seems and feels like that is the general consensus at a lot of companies, many haskell shops having moved to using mainly rust, etc. Everything in Haskell is an academic exercise with very little to show for it in the end. The performance is not that great, and even with "fearless concurrency", most complicated performance tuning situations are entirely consumed by understanding the intricacies of GHC Haskell and how to best tune your program by letting GHC abstractions leak into your code in the appropriate places to get it to run fast. People constantly keep reinventing streaming libraries because there are always problems or compromises, etc etc. I really used to be on the haskell bandwagon for many years, but these days, when I reach for it, I end up really wondering why. Even the dev tooling is still bad, slow and buggy.