Can you possibly link to those articles directly? I'm not really able to add much based on just the abstract. My thoughts on the book was that he was not makin

Can you possibly link to those articles directly? I'm not really able to add much based on just the abstract. My thoughts on the book was that he was not making hard claims, but that the anomalies, particularly the joint probability of such anomalies, should lead us to at least be open to the idea of ET origins. His issue seemed to be that the idea was being superficially dismissed and not allowing it to be discussed, particularly with younger scientists without it potentially damaging their career. My recollection was that he wasn't even saying it was probable, just not impossible, and gatekeeping around investigating that possibility is bad science.