4 ms·
It would be interesting to follow the money trail on these 16 scientists. I do somewhat buy the plausibility of the economic arguement that reacting to global
by mathattack 15y ago
It would be interesting to follow the money trail on these 16 scientists.
I do somewhat buy the plausibility of the economic arguement that reacting to global warning is more efficient than trying to stop it.
The "it's not proven" crowd seem to be in the same camp as the folks claiming you can't prove smoking causes cancer.