4 ms·
I don't really understand your comment. - What do they win by pushing Kotlin against Java (for reasons that are not also beneficial to developers)? The word "a
by jraph 4y ago
I don't really understand your comment.
- What do they win by pushing Kotlin against Java (for reasons that are not also beneficial to developers)? The word "agenda" makes it seem like they have evil intents
- Doesn't Kotlin depend on the JVM, and so wouldn't it benefit from an upgrade
- Isn't Kotlin a programming language that uses the JVM and the Java standard library anyway? (I saw a bit of Kotlin, I contributed a small patch to QKSMS, it seems it is a bit like Groovy in that it is an alternative syntax but is essentially Java with some syntax sugar and some additional classes to make some tasks easier)
I understand that Kotlin may not directly benefit from the new Java language features, but it seems like it would benefit from all the other advances.
(I'm not defending Google, I don't like them)
- re-thc 4y agoKotlin is a safety net because Google/Android vs Oracle (the lawsuit).
- pjmlp 4y agoNot really, because Kotlin is useless without JVM ecosystem. InteliJ/Android Studio, Gradle and Maven Central libraries. Kotlin/Native was so well done that they had to reboot the effort. If they cared about so much, they should have migrated to Dart instead.
- re-thc 4y agoIt's just a diversion? We're using Kotlin and not Java? The fact that Kotlin uses Java is then Kotlin's problem (so to speak).