4 ms·
> There's less red tape to getting infrastructure provisioned if you work on a team that's outside of core product. This here is the compelling case for the cl
by kneebonian 4y ago
> There's less red tape to getting infrastructure provisioned if you work on a team that's outside of core product.
This here is the compelling case for the cloud. It was always less about the features and the money save, it's that I now have 1 stop shop vendor, if I need a queue I can spin it up in 10 minutes, instead of filling out a ticket to internal IT getting them to put it on their backlog waiting until they have the cycles, and in the meantime I'm sitting on my thumbs.
I need a new server, in the old times it was a ticket, a budget meeting, two or three levels of sign off, a business case, on and on. Whereas in AWS or Azure I can spin up a box in about 20 minutes and be all ready to go, and happily start developing.
Just like MS was never about technical excellence, it was about being a pre-approved vendor that had everything you needed, so you wouldn't have to go through another vendor approval process. Same with the cloud now scaled down to a team size, I now know I am pre-authorized to spin up X number of resources without having to worry about security throwing a fit, or blowing an enormous amount of money.
- revelio 4y agoBut you must realise that the reason cloud costs are out of control is exactly because those budget meetings were actually not pointless.