> I dont think calling SVB poorly run is accurate, it was run for profits. Well, are they profitable? If they are currently failing to achieve what they suppos

> I dont think calling SVB poorly run is accurate, it was run for profits. Well, are they profitable? If they are currently failing to achieve what they supposedly aim for, surely the way they are run leaves something to be desired? It may be tempting to argue that "they were well run until the bad thing happened" but that is a fairly low bar for running things well.