I make no political judgments or make aspirations toward conservatives. It’s just that this case is an example of conflicting policy goals of a particular poli

I make no political judgments or make aspirations toward conservatives. It’s just that this case is an example of conflicting policy goals of a particular political movement. It is an interesting case for that reason (among others). Regardless of cause or politics or any other consideration it is still true that qualified immunity is effectively tyrannical and therefore ought to be opposed. Police should not be immune to purposefully violating civil rights. Regardless of who is in power or control.