4 ms·
I'm on Mastodon, but I find the experience extremely frustrating. The UI has all the annoyances of Twitter's (which I also dislike), and more besides. It's a fu
by TRiG_Ireland 4y ago
I'm on Mastodon, but I find the experience extremely frustrating. The UI has all the annoyances of Twitter's (which I also dislike), and more besides. It's a fun enough place to mess around and post throwaway jokes, but using it for anything serious would be a mistake: federation means that often only some of the posts in a given thread make it to your server, so often bits of a conversation are silently missing. This can lead to all kinds of miscommunication, misunderstanding, unintentional offence, and talking at cross purposes. It is, to my mind, a massive design flaw.
(The fact that most servers have a fairly low character limit for posts, but allow chaining posts together to make threads is another problem, inherited from Twitter. It's harder to write; it's harder to read. It's harder to read even if all the posts in a chain federate to your server, which they may not. Individual posts in the middle of a chain may surface on the timeline out of context and make no sense. The entire structure is ridiculous, irritating, and pointlessly difficult to use.)
- swayvil 4y agoThe Mastodon/Twitter format lends itself to a bite-sized form of conversation. Consumed and replied to in a moment. It optimizes for something I'm sure. Maybe "conversation volume" It's popular.
- rchaud 4y agoI used a FOSS android app called Tusky and for the most part I can't tell the difference between that and Twitter.
- TRiG_Ireland 4y agoI asked a Mastodon howto question, and got an answer almost immediately. A week later, someone else helpfully provided the same answer, because the previous answer had not federated to his server. It's not a matter of which app you use: conversations will silently be missing bits.