3 ms·
> If I was managing 30-50 people,... I directly managed 22 people at one point. 1:1s were an every other week affair. While it was possible, it was not sust
by fatnoah 4y ago
> If I was managing 30-50 people,...
I directly managed 22 people at one point. 1:1s were an every other week affair.
While it was possible, it was not sustainable. Keeping track of everyone and their goals & growth, flogging the PM team, running interference with the Sales team, keeping the exec team from interfering, etc. made it far more than a full time job. I was first in the office and last to leave, just so I could get stuff done.
- zo1 4y agoHaving a 1 on 1 with each report every 2 weeks is the problem here, not the amount of people. Where did this 1 on 1 stuff make it into the manager bible? You do your job and if you don't like something, ask for a 1 on 1. If your senior notices something, he arranges a 1 on 1. But this is also way too late already. A good manager picks up on issues way before this point.