This emotive approach to computer science might be inefficient but meaningful for rare questions of taste and ideology (e.g. substring functions: lengths or ind

This emotive approach to computer science might be inefficient but meaningful for rare questions of taste and ideology (e.g. substring functions: lengths or indices?), but I don't see how it could possibly help learning hard details (e.g. what escape codes can show up in your strings?) or even universal theoretical concepts (e.g. how do you use these synchronization primitives correctly, and why?). From a more positive angle, you shouldn't worry about understanding "a very different model of the world" because, being a mathematical model of the world it cannot be much different from yours.