> But I've always been skeptical that the human body would be completely unaffected by higher doses of non-ionizing radiation beyond baseline, for extended peri

> But I've always been skeptical that the human body would be completely unaffected by higher doses of non-ionizing radiation beyond baseline, for extended periods of time. Well, what would you consider to be baseline? The overwhelming majority of the non-ionizing radiation that we experience comes in the form of visible and near-visible light. If you sit near a window all day, your baseline is going to be much higher than someone who sits in a gloomy, dark office. No amount of EMF fog from nearby electronics is going to come close to making up that difference. According to NASA, the amount of energy reaching earth’s outer atmosphere from the sun is about 1360 W/m^2 for the portion of atmosphere directly facing the sun.[1] Most of that is non-ionizing, and some of it is filtered out, but that’s still a lot. Another great example is a smartphone. If you use your phone for a few hours each day, the overwhelming majority of the non-ionizing radiation emitted comes from the screen, not the radio. While you could theoretically exceed that dosage per square meter by, say, sticking your hand in a microwave oven, doing so would be fairly uncomfortable. If we were to find that non-ionizing radiation causes problems at low doses (below where we perceive it as heat), it would have to be specific wavelengths, not just non-ionizing radiation in general. [1]: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance/page2.php https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance/pag...