>SVG Native was supposed to fix that [1]. [...] However, it didn't get much interest and it's starting to look like a dead version of SVG. It's pretty bad mark

>SVG Native was supposed to fix that [1]. [...] However, it didn't get much interest and it's starting to look like a dead version of SVG. It's pretty bad marketing to call a different product by the same name. Particularly when it chooses a totally different side of the trade-off versus its homonym. Not only have I never heard of SVG Native, I'm confident that I'm going to forget what it is in a few days because I don't have a proper name to remember it by. Also, the adjective "native" here gives me no useful information as to what problem it tries to solve — how do I infer "simplified" from "native"?