17 ms·

For manually-editing-browser-extensions allergies who are already allergic to manually-editing-links: https://libredirect.github.io https://libredirect.github.i

For manually-editing-browser-extensions allergies who are already allergic to manually-editing-links: https://libredirect.github.io https://libredirect.github.io

SebastianKra 4y ago
For iOS & Safari users: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/privacy-redirect/id1578144015 https://apps.apple.com/de/app/privacy-redirect/id1578144015
bmacho 4y ago
Or for people that are allergic to random browser extensions : // ==UserScript== // @name twitter redirect // @namespace - // @version - // @description redirects twitter to nitter // @author - // @noframes // @match http://twitter.com/* // @match https://twitter.com/* // @match http://*.twitter.com/* // @match https://*.twitter.com/* // @exclude http://platform.twitter.com/* // @exclude https://platform.twitter.com/* // @grant none // @run-at document-start // ==/UserScript== var nitterInstance = "https://nitter.net" if (window.top != window.self) { //don't run in frames or iframes return; } const loc = window.location const path = loc.pathname const host = loc.host const href = loc.href console.info( "host:", host, "\npath:", path, "\nhref:", href ); let redirectTo = "" if ( host == "twitter.com" || host.endsWith(".twitter.com") ) { redirectTo = `${nitterInstance}${path}` doRedirect() } function doRedirect() { console.info( `==> RedirectTo ${ redirectTo }` ) window.location.assign( redirectTo ) } It is extensible. Maybe I should group the site specific data together, so one could add/remove new sites at one place instead of several (two?) different places. Also checking against a ?noredirect or something in the URL sound like a feature I could use.
- falcor84 4y ago
  That's too long, could you please instead give me a GPT prompt that would generate that? /s

For manually-editing-browser-extensions allergies who are already allergic to manually-editing-links: https://libredirect.github.io https://libredirect.github.io

SebastianKra 4y ago

For iOS & Safari users: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/privacy-redirect/id1578144015 https://apps.apple.com/de/app/privacy-redirect/id1578144015

bmacho 4y ago

Or for people that are allergic to random browser extensions : // ==UserScript== // @name twitter redirect // @namespace - // @version - // @description redirects twitter to nitter // @author - // @noframes // @match http://twitter.com/* // @match https://twitter.com/* // @match http://*.twitter.com/* // @match https://*.twitter.com/* // @exclude http://platform.twitter.com/* // @exclude https://platform.twitter.com/* // @grant none // @run-at document-start // ==/UserScript== var nitterInstance = "https://nitter.net" if (window.top != window.self) { //don't run in frames or iframes return; } const loc = window.location const path = loc.pathname const host = loc.host const href = loc.href console.info( "host:", host, "\npath:", path, "\nhref:", href ); let redirectTo = "" if ( host == "twitter.com" || host.endsWith(".twitter.com") ) { redirectTo = `${nitterInstance}${path}` doRedirect() } function doRedirect() { console.info( `==> RedirectTo ${ redirectTo }` ) window.location.assign( redirectTo ) } It is extensible. Maybe I should group the site specific data together, so one could add/remove new sites at one place instead of several (two?) different places. Also checking against a ?noredirect or something in the URL sound like a feature I could use.

falcor84 4y ago
That's too long, could you please instead give me a GPT prompt that would generate that? /s