3 ms·
it's a shame to see shallow responses to what was actually quite a nuanced point. The paragraph ended with: > we’re focusing on understanding this further and
by zmmmmm 4y ago
it's a shame to see shallow responses to what was actually quite a nuanced point.
The paragraph ended with:
> we’re focusing on understanding this further and finding ways to make sure people build the necessary connections to work effectively. In the meantime, I encourage all of you to find more opportunities to work with your colleagues in person
So this is not in the least requiring employees to return to the office. In fact a reasonable reading of it is that it's actually supporting remote work by specifically articulating what is necessary for it to work well and then planning to facilitate that. It's a far more intelligent approach than the blunt option of "let's just force everyone back to the office 3 days a week".
- cidergal 4y agoI think you're wrong here. Reread it, as it implies that remote work is not working "effectively"