>Or it there another reason? As you can see, no one that isn't forced to has any interest in aptX. Someone (everyone?) in the BT consortium makes/made additio

>Or it there another reason? As you can see, no one that isn't forced to has any interest in aptX. Someone (everyone?) in the BT consortium makes/made additional money from using something proprietary. Otherwise BT would just support Opus for many years already.