4 ms·
But I think whether this is a protection measure is undecided.
by none_to_remain 4y ago
But I think whether this is a protection measure is undecided.
- bawolff 4y agoI think it would be hard to argue it isn't. It is the only value that such a system could theoretically provide, so there is no other reason someone would use it. What would be the argument that it is not one?
- alwayslikethis 4y agoHow are you applying a filter or circumventing anything if you are simply training a brand new model with a bunch of "cloaked" images?
- bawolff 4y agoOh, i was thinking the scenario was more a specialized tool to remove the "glaze". Hmm. That's a good point and now i am less sure. I suspect it would come down to intentionality.
- none_to_remain 4y agoI looked at the definition in the law and it was unclear to me whether this technique met the definition. Among other things there's no "authorized deGlazing" to recover the original going on during human viewings. But there seemed to be enough leeway that maybe a judge could find a fit