3 ms·
The description (as well as the project as a whole) is incredibly disingenuous and capitalized heavily on artist's fear of being trained by AI. Even one pass o
by not-chatgpt 4y ago
The description (as well as the project as a whole) is incredibly disingenuous and capitalized heavily on artist's fear of being trained by AI.
Even one pass of SD's img2img with low denoise is enough to bypass this data poisoning attack. It's a useless attack that makes training a tidbit more inconvenient.
The project also gained infamy when it stole code from an open source project with GPL license without giving credits.
Additionally, SD now offers opt outs for artists and MD likely does not train on these artists at all, and there are way more effective ways to protect art than using this algorithm.
- atleastoptimal 4y agoThis project and a lot of projects in the future will be in a similar vein. Something that appeals to the fear of being cheated or made irrelevant by AI by returning primacy to the human. It all seems good intentioned but also naïve, like when robots take over doing all surgery and massively reduce the risk of accidental death, surgeons will get together and insist they ban the robots and that humans still do it better, even if they don't.