6 ms·
Most likely, yes. Those with a different worldview are cut off from the fediverse and many client apps blacklist those instances that gain momentum from being u
by gray_charger 4y ago
Most likely, yes. Those with a different worldview are cut off from the fediverse and many client apps blacklist those instances that gain momentum from being usable in the client app. For example, Gab.
- nforgerit 4y agoDo you have a link to the instance(s) that were blacklisted you're referring to?
- malf 4y agoThe blacklist is visible on the about page of each instance. Feel free to go sample a few. The first one I tried had literal swastikas in the user name of the first post. It went downhill from there.
- irq 4y ago> Those with a different worldview are cut off from the fediverse I find this happens most often to people with a worldview that is objectively incompatible with civilization.
- PixyMisa 4y agoEvidenced by the fact that they disagree with the progressive orthodoxy of the moment.
- numpad0 4y agoI find this to happen between groups of instances which audiences has different stamps on the front cover of passports. In case that is going to turn out to correlate with “worldview[s] that [are] objectively incompatible with [the other] civilization”, … what could it mean …
- ModernMech 4y agoThey are more than welcome to spew their incompatible worldview on Twitter. I don’t understand why anyone would be upset they don’t feel welcome on Mastodon; they got everything they wanted on Twitter from Musk.
- LudwigNagasena 4y agoCivilizations were built on slavery, imperialism, xenophobia, exploitation, theft, appropriation and intolerance.
- kuschku 4y agoIsn't that the free market you want? You can build your own client (even by forking!) if you disagree.
- jeroenhd 4y agoIn my experience, the blacklists are all pretty sensible. Mostly porn, neonazis, that kind of stuff. I haven't opened Gab in a while so I just loaded the front page, and I can see why Mastodon moderators don't want to deal with them either. The content is not as blatantly illegal as many other blacklisted sites, but the front page is incredibly toxic and hateful. I would block most of those posts if they woulf ever hit my personal instance. Feel free to join (or set up) an instance that doesn't employ blacklists, though. The default Mastodon configuration comes with an empty blacklist so I'm sure there are servers out there that will let you access Gab and other blacklisted servers if you wish. However, other servers are allowed to block you or your server at their digression if you're boosting or posting content they don't care for. After all, freedom of speech does not imply any obligation to be heard.
- redeeman 4y agoits kinda easy to be labelled neonazi these days
- jeroenhd 4y agoPerhaps, but the people I'm referring to actually promote the idea that Jews deserve to be killed for being Jews.
- M2Ys4U 4y agoThere are a lot of neonazis around these days...
- hagbarth 4y agoIs it? Hasn't been a problem for me.
- realjhol 4y agoThat's because you're not in the "basket of deplorables"
- 4y ago
- Lutger 4y agoThis is incorrect. With some charity, you could say Gab has a different worldview. However, there are also people who think sex with children is ok. That is also technically 'a different worldview'. You see, there is a reason Gab has been cut off, and it is not just that he has a different worldview. If you don't list the specific reason, you distort the most important part of this particular moderation. I noticed this is a fairly common myth in what seems like a right-wing frame of 'progressive politics trying to limit freedom of speech'.