4 ms·
>Losers: University of Chicago, all the students who worked on it, all the artists who believed in it. Protip for the Glaze team: Snake oil is not a panacea for
by DiscourseFan 4y ago
>Losers: University of Chicago, all the students who worked on it, all the artists who believed in it. Protip for the Glaze team: Snake oil is not a panacea for anything and prescribing it does not make you a doctor.
I don't know why you are so aggressively insulting the team who worked on this project. If someone creates an art piece and specifically asks for it to not be included in a model, then they should also have the ability to take the extra-precaution to prevent someone from including it in one. Art is by nature a social phenomenon, and so is the creation of the AI art-generating tools. In the end, technology will not "overcome" the social issue, already we are having public debates about the ethics of these technologies and how we can best use them for social benefit instead of social harm. No AI art generating algorithm could've ever been created if not for the work of countless artists which the model learned from AND the work of countless engineers who created those very models, there is an inextricable relationship between the machine output and the human labor involved, and this will not be resolved unless people are willing to work together to create something new and extraordinary. The combativeness is not helpful.
- elf_noise 4y agoThe losing had nothing to do with what they wanted the application to do. I would say being associated with plagiarizing code and breaking licenses is a losing result.
- DiscourseFan 4y ago>I would say being associated with plagiarizing code and breaking licenses is a losing result. I would say that calling something "snake oil" probably isn't a reference to plagiarizing code or breaking licenses.
- elf_noise 4y agoHappy to take that down. I don't know what else to call code that doesn't work, suggestions?
- mistercheph 4y agoElf noise