3 ms·
> it also violated the GPL license of DiffusionBee. Isn't "critic" / "research" / "education" good fair-use cases?
by j16sdiz 4y ago
> it also violated the GPL license of DiffusionBee.
Isn't "critic" / "research" / "education" good fair-use cases?
- GaggiX 4y agohttps://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLFairUse https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLFairUse I don't know how small the snippet has to be to be considered fair in court, but it looks like they copied large portion of code.
- bawolff 4y agoWhether this counts as that seems like a complex question. Certainly i don't see how this is a critique.
- p_l 4y agoThis is creation of derivative art and publishing it in violation of license. Fair use is violated by the scale of copy-paste involved, and well, none of "critic", "research", or "education" are the uses involved in the release of the derived art. (Writing a paper would fall under "research", iirc)