3 ms·
I think that the authors of Glaze released the code after it was discovered. Edit: https://mobile.twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636439335569375238 https://mobil
by GaggiX 4y ago
I think that the authors of Glaze released the code after it was discovered.
Edit: https://mobile.twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636439335569375238 https://mobile.twitter.com/ravenben/status/16364393355693752..., he is talking about releasing the code behind the front-end even if the back-end also violates the license.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zarzavat 4y agoIs DiffusionBee AGPL? If not, they don’t have to release any backend code if they are not distributing it as binaries or obfuscated code. GPL says: if you distribute something that is based upon GPL code, then you must be prepared to offer the full code to the thing you distributed, on demand. You can even charge a reasonable fee to cover your costs. Someone asked them for the code, they responded by publishing it, so there has been no GPL violation. There is only a violation if they refuse a valid request.
- GaggiX 4y agoThe backend is obfuscated using Pyarmor.