3 ms·
Ground crew increased risk is probably coming almost completely from exposure to carcinogens in the materials they're working with. However, the gap between gr
by icegreentea2 4y ago
Ground crew increased risk is probably coming almost completely from exposure to carcinogens in the materials they're working with.
However, the gap between ground crew rates and air crew rates, plus known similar effects in civilian airliner crew (https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aircrew/cancer.html https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/aircrew/cancer.html) indicates that it's likely that a significant component of increased risk for pilots and aircrew may be related to high altitude.
This doesn't rule out something like... increased exposure to flame-retardants (or something) (fabrics, other materials, or maybe off-gasing into air supply) that may be carcinogenic.
- amluto 4y agoDo fighter planes use bleed air for cabin air the way that almost all commercial jets do?
- stametseater 4y agoThey do pressurize the cockpits, but the pilots breath through their masks. At high altitudes, the cockpit air isn't pressurized enough to prevent hypoxia so they need masks.
- amluto 4y agoWhere does the air in the masks come from? I assume it’s a mix of bottled oxygen and something else.