I see Florian's back. For those who don't know, he's always been aggressively anti-google. Enough so that it became an issue in Oracle vs Google as to whether

I see Florian's back. For those who don't know, he's always been aggressively anti-google. Enough so that it became an issue in Oracle vs Google as to whether Oracle was paying him. In fact, they were: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19181172 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19181172 You can judge for yourself whether he disclosed it properly. If you go back and read his endless posts about how Google was going to lose and how Oracle was clearly in the right and ..., and then compare it to the case outcome, it shows you all you need to know. In this case, it's pretty simple. If someone ordered Google to save specific people's chats, and they didn't, or their is a reasonable anticipation of litigation, they may get in trouble. Otherwise, they won't. Epic's claims were ... not crazy at least. The DOJ, at least what i read of them, were a little far out there in a number of cases They basically were claiming that because they started investigating Google 2019, Google should have saved the chats of 100k+ employees for 4 years.