4 ms·
I don’t like to impinge upon the purity of your vision, but this needs to be said. such extreme actions don’t work. you need to boil the frog slowly. I apprecia
by permo-w 4y ago
I don’t like to impinge upon the purity of your vision, but this needs to be said. such extreme actions don’t work. you need to boil the frog slowly. I appreciate that this is the argument that an interested party would make, but there’s a reason for that and that’s because it makes sense. in practice, without supreme power—and even then—swift swingeing actions create anger, disobedience, fight, even if the people affected agree with you. some people are simply mistrustful of fast change of any variety: good or bad. small c conservatives in other words. they will kill you, doesn’t matter how right you are
better to slowly increase the temperature
- O__________O 4y ago>> you need to boil the frog slowly Possible I am mistaken, but 70% of world’s wildlife has disappeared past 50 years. Exactly how much time do you think is left? >> they will kill you, doesn’t matter how right you are Agree.
- permo-w 4y agoit doesn’t matter. progress is better than no progress, which is the certain result of what you’re suggesting
- O__________O 4y agoNo, that’s not true. Rapid change is possible. Majority of world is only 7 connections part, given enough social pressure, it will stop. Having simple messaging is critical, such as if you eat meat, not talking to you, buying from you, voting for you, etc. One thing that would be useful though is a super cheap test to check if someone has eaten meat recently.
- nostromo123 4y agoBest to just shoot these pesky meat eaters in the name of saving the planet, right? /s
- O__________O 4y agoThink it’s much more likely meat eaters would be the ones doing the killing.