3 ms·
I am appalled that we’re at a point where 4 rich spoiled males bantering is considered A) entertainment B) source of actual information. I shiver.
by camillomiller 4y ago
I am appalled that we’re at a point where 4 rich spoiled males bantering is considered A) entertainment B) source of actual information. I shiver.
- xiphias2 4y agoIf you think those rich people are spoiled people you have no idea how more than 50% of people on earth behave as soon as they have just a little bit of money.
- gjvc 4y agohaven't you ever watched the likes of bloomberg or cnbc? Also, I would expect their figures to have peaked following this episode as the cancellation crew moves in.
- paulcole 4y ago4 guys do it and it makes us sick. 4,000 guys do it and we call it HN.
- abhv 4y agoi was skeptical. But these four probably do 100 meetings a week each, many about new deals with new founders. They hear a lot of smart ideas and the best of those are going to leak out when the videos are all about trying to sound smart.
- chrishare 4y agoI listen, though (or because?) most of the topics are irrelevant to me. I do find it entertaining, and there is at least some insight being shared. I think you need to know what to listen to and what to ignore; be skeptical of pretty much any rationalization David Sacks makes of his ideological views, question some of Chamath's hypocritical moral grand-standing (how does SPAC grubbiness not stick to him?), ignore Jason's insecurities etc. Fundamentally though, they are four well-connected, intelligent people talking about issues that do matter in an entertaining format.