3 ms·
dang, it's far too late to change the submission title when there are already hundreds of comments focused on the old title. The commentary makes no sense now.
by lapcat 4y ago
dang, it's far too late to change the submission title when there are already hundreds of comments focused on the old title. The commentary makes no sense now.
If anything, there should be a separate submission with the new title.
- dang 4y agoNormally I would agree but not in this case. There's plenty of context in the thread, readers are smart enough to figure it out, and adamgordonbell is right: the talk, and the speaker, deserve better. You're right that titles dominate discussion though. That's one of the most reliable phenomena on HN, for better or worse.
- tkhattra 4y agoi submitted it ~4 days ago with the title "Ken Thompson's 75 year project", but the title was evidently too boring to gain any traction :) (like some others have commented, the raspbian os "revelation" was the least interesting part for me too) it was cool to hear that he's still working on chess endgames, an interest which goes back many decades too [1]. [1] https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/ken-games.html https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/ken-games.html