2 ms·
>> Yes, and last week the backstop was 30B CHF. So why did they increase that by more than 3x within days? Makes no sense other than UBS finally looked at the b
by TuringNYC 4y ago
>> Yes, and last week the backstop was 30B CHF. So why did they increase that by more than 3x within days? Makes no sense other than UBS finally looked at the books and freaked out.
There were likely internal (to CS) marks based on assumptions. The assumptions may have assumed baseline market conditions. External parties came in and didnt want to assume baseline market conditions and/or didnt agree with the assumptions, so they were changed to more conservative figures, and new marks came out. The new marks were significantly lower. They have veto power over the deal and the government was forced to backstop to make the deal happen.