4 ms·
I love the Bloomberg headline. It does not say "... in Historic Deal to End the Credit Suisse Crisis." Instead, it says "... in Historic Deal to End Crisis." On
by g42gregory 4y ago
I love the Bloomberg headline. It does not say "... in Historic Deal to End the Credit Suisse Crisis." Instead, it says "... in Historic Deal to End Crisis." On the remote chance that you thought there might be some sort of global bank crisis, Bloomberg tells you that it is already ending. Since Bloomberg tries to manipulate people's perception so openly (most people do not read beyond the headline), this makes me even more worried. What else its out there that they don't want me to know?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> What else its out there that they don't want me to know? If only Bloomberg News had competitors.
- g42gregory 4y agoBut is it possible to refer to them here?
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoMainstreams are the Journal and Financial Times, but practically every genre has droves of researchers cranking out everything from the questionable to prescient. (Almost universally, free blogs are the former.)
- g42gregory 4y agoYou are not saying that WSJ has anything to do with truthful reporting or investigative journalism? FT used to be better, but I think now descended to the same level. You can used them to gauge the current market sentiment or the sentiment they are trying to push, but certainly not the financial reality/truth. You get periodic bright spots like Theranos reporting, but that’s rare.
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoSkip the opinion section and headlines. The meat of both papers is solid, with ongoing investigative journalism. After that, you need to pay up for industry periodicals, et cetera.
- weard_beard 4y agoThere's always the "VICE news" of wall street... https://wallstreetonparade.com/ https://wallstreetonparade.com/