2 ms·
cant agree more, vercel likes ssr,and it now owns nextjs and svelte,then it forces ssr on the community,it is basically leveraging open source for its own busin
by synergy20 4y ago
cant agree more, vercel likes ssr,and it now owns nextjs and svelte,then it forces ssr on the community,it is basically leveraging open source for its own business needs solely, which will not last long if they keep doing this down the road. disappointed.
- leerob 4y agoYou can use Next.js in SPA mode – you don't have to use SSR. Here are the current docs (https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export) and we're working on an improved version for the new App Router (https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/configuring/static-export https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/configuring/static-export) based on community feedback. With this export, can you deploy anywhere you prefer.
- synergy20 4y agothis is still the ssr-first-but-will-do-it-all, I read the docs along with svletekit(which by the way, is the same tone, saying sveltekit does both SSR and CSR). it is NOT, I do not need wade through all those unnecessary SSR code and doc and steps and some second-class-citizen configurations to figure out how to get a CSR out of it. CSR users are not that dumb. It seems to me Vercel is the only one pushing for SSR-for-everything, I switched from svelte to React for exactly that reason, now React/Next.js is selling the same thing, I'm back to Vue. Please do not ever buy-or-influence Vuejs for SSR-first-and-does-everything-you-need, at least leave one untouched for us who cares nothing about SEOs.