5 ms·
If that AGI is an artificial intelligence capable of solving human relevant problems but does not do anything more, then sure, however; if it can draw its own c
by anonzzzies 4y ago
If that AGI is an artificial intelligence capable of solving human relevant problems but does not do anything more, then sure, however; if it can draw its own conclusions and can change itself, it will rapidly be vastly smarter than anything we ever encountered. It’ll grow over 1000 iq in no time flat and we won’t know what it’s doing or talking about (it’ll have its own language after 5 minutes to communicate to its clones) and it doesn’t give a shite what we wrote or didn’t write in the past at all. If malignant or not (in our eyes) will have nothing to do with us.
- dkjaudyeqooe 4y agoIn the event, you should probably pipe down, because they'll come after you first, seeing as you know too much.
- runlaszlorun 4y agoNo… come after me first! I call dibs on this AGI death match action. Roko… do you hear me?
- alextheparrot 4y agoAside, but 1,000 IQ is a funny number to me. I’m pretty sure that would be 60 standard deviations from a median human, which has a probability density on the order of 10^-700. Would be hard to come up with enough questions to give reasonable confidence in that distribution — maybe a task for a future intelligence