3 ms·
Please submit the original source. This blogspam mentions (but does not link to) what I believe to be this story from the FT[0]. Update: It does link to it fur
by ctoth 4y ago
Please submit the original source. This blogspam mentions (but does not link to) what I believe to be this story from the FT[0].
Update: It does link to it further down in the article, instead of the perfectly-reasonable place where it first mentions it. It is this article they are referencing.
[0]: https://www.ft.com/content/6e23a2fb-484e-418d-b309-bf558b3a6a17 https://www.ft.com/content/6e23a2fb-484e-418d-b309-bf558b3a6...
- croutonwagon 4y agoFT is heavily paywalled, including this version of the article. It would not be able to be read linking only the source. Even my bypass paywalls options cant overcome most of FTs blocks at times. https://archive.is/2023.03.16-111653/https://www.ft.com/content/6e23a2fb-484e-418d-b309-bf558b3a6a17 https://archive.is/2023.03.16-111653/https://www.ft.com/cont...
- momirlan 4y ago> [0]: https://www.ft.com/content/6e23a2fb-484e-418d-b309-bf558b3a6 https://www.ft.com/content/6e23a2fb-484e-418d-b309-bf558b3a6... Yes, it's very clear what FT reveals about SVB, and it's not at all what Axios learned from their article: "However, insiders complained as the bank grew at breakneck speed, its top management became inordinately focused on social issues and overly reliant on the use of expensive consultants to explore new strategies, when they should have prioritised management of the bank’s expansion and properly hedging against its interest rate risk."