> I talked about anti-competitive behavior. Literally anything that any company does to try to compete can be labeled as anti-competitive. That’s why there ar

> I talked about anti-competitive behavior. Literally anything that any company does to try to compete can be labeled as anti-competitive. That’s why there are real lawyers… > My citation was to point to an FTC page on bundling services, the way AWS "bundles" is the same effect So now are you saying that all bundles are illegal even though your citation says just the opposite? > This doesn't hold. AWS already has leverage over their customers and the cost of leaving to another cloud provider (which probably does something similar) is not worth the remedy, exactly the kind of behavior the FTC would be looking for. So what do you think the “FTC would be looking for” when AWS and all of the cloud providers combine account for a minuscule amount of IT spend? > EU Monopolist or Chicago? The EU take is completely irrelevant - especially when citing the FTC. > Your comment comes off as demeaning and uncivil. It doesn't appear that you discuss in good fair. Honestly, you just got called out because your citation does nothing to bolster your argument and you’re just really throwing things against the wall.