3 ms·
Release the information when you get it and say, “do with this what you will.” Not at all what they did. They released in batches, for maximum effect, right up
by bandyaboot 4y ago
Release the information when you get it and say, “do with this what you will.” Not at all what they did. They released in batches, for maximum effect, right up until the election. They knew exactly what they were doing.
- the_third_wave 4y agoThat is more or less what the New York Post did with the information on the "Hunter Biden Laptop". It did not work out very well for the New York Post, nor for what is now finally being admitted as "the truth" - this being that the device was his, that the material on the device was his, that the material was not "obtained by hacking". It did work out quite well for Hunter Biden and his family which seems to have been the intended result. Had Wikileaks done the same they would have met with the same fate: they would have been accused of being in bed with whatever enemy-du-jour could be concocted and the material would have been buried under miles of accusations.
- leereeves 4y agoOr consider what the Clintons did to the many women who truthfully (we now know) accused Bill of sexual harassment. There is no way to publish damaging information about the Clintons without being attacked for it.
- 93po 4y ago> They released in batches, for maximum effect, right up until the election. They knew exactly what they were doing. There is absolutely no way to know the intent here, and there are plenty of rational reasons to release things in batches.
- bandyaboot 4y agoThe first of the batched releases being on the eve of the Democratic National Convention and proceeding daily if I remember correctly right up until shortly before the election. Get real.