5 ms·
Yeah. We increasingly want to believe that there exists a viable substitute for everything, that we can have it all. For example, there are clear health benefi
by GalenErso 4y ago
Yeah. We increasingly want to believe that there exists a viable substitute for everything, that we can have it all.
For example, there are clear health benefits associated with long term relationships and marriage. Some antisocial people would like to believe that that doesn't matter because they can replicate these benefits if only they eat clean, exercise, abstain from alcohol, etc. Well, turns out, there are health benefits to LTRs that cannot be replicated otherwise. Your theory is one possibility. But simply eating clean, working out, getting a lot of sleep, drinking water, and having clean bills of health and good blood tests isn't enough. You will still die earlier than someone who's not single. You won't have the discipline to maintain this lifestyle until the end of your life.
But you can't enjoy the benefits of singlehood and the benefits of LTRs at the same time. This is controversial. But you can't have it all. You can't optimize your life for everything at the same time. We're disgusted at the idea that we may have to pay a cost or sacrifice something. In this case, sacrificing the freedom of choice and the flexibility that comes with singlehood for the health benefits of LTRs. But no. We want the freedom of choice, the flexibility, and the benefits of LTRs.
Similarly, you can't become rich quickly without taking an incredible amount of risk that will in all probability leave you worse off. Other than luck, the true and tried path to long term wealth is to grind for decades at a job or a profession that brings money. Being a doctor, or a FAANG SWE, or starting a business. This all takes hard work and patience. But some people would rather try their hand at get rich quick schemes with cryptocurrency, options trading, or other scams. Very few succeed. That's luck. Most fail.
- paulryanrogers 4y ago> You will still die earlier than someone who's not single. This assumes the reason people in LTR's live longer is because of LTR's, and not that healthier or more fit people are more likely to score LTR's. IME people settle once they think a relationship is locked in and let themselves go.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoPerhaps. But people who give up on relationships also let themselves go as well. On the other hand, when you're a couple, you might be tempted to let yourself go, but at least there's a chance your mate will refuse to go. Since our behavior is driven by environment (a la we observe the norm, and conform) you'll resist temptation and stay healthy. Habits are easier to maintain when you're not alone. This alone might give couples the edge.
- hotpotamus 4y agoYou've convinced me. Where do I purchase a wife? If she speaks English, that would be a plus.
- gnicholas 4y agoOpenAI has a model available that speaks several languages, including English.
- bluefirebrand 4y agoPerfect, everyone wants to marry a model, right?
- gnicholas 4y agoPerennial submission for the university economics department T-shirt competition: “Economists do it with models”
- chiefalchemist 4y agoI missed the pun the first time. Well played.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoBut OpenAI lacks gut bacteria.