Right, and his response is, while not quite the exact opposite of the title, tangential to it at best. He says that programming has only ever been a tool to cre

Right, and his response is, while not quite the exact opposite of the title, tangential to it at best. He says that programming has only ever been a tool to create software for humans, so just studying programming as an abstract concept detached from product skills is not advised. He does not say CS jobs will be obsolete in the future — if I can read into it a little, he's implying that the completely theoretical CS approach has never been the right path anyway, and AI will make that more obvious.