I would note that it seems he said “AI” consistently but the journalist wrote “Chatgpt” in the headline. I would have agreed with you two years ago. But knowin

I would note that it seems he said “AI” consistently but the journalist wrote “Chatgpt” in the headline. I would have agreed with you two years ago. But knowing what we’ve done with AI before this (grand master level chess, cars that can self drive, etc) building an ensemble from those and what these LLM are able to do, I think if you don’t see 10 years from now being on its head from today, I think you might have lost the capacity to dream. I don’t think LLM alone are sufficient. But pointing to what they produced in beta and saying “time is static the universe is done AI is a crock” seems myopic.