4 ms·
Doesn't this assume that the no-code tools won't be smart enough to understand the most probably correct course of action, and to look up information automatica
by edgineer 4y ago
Doesn't this assume that the no-code tools won't be smart enough to understand the most probably correct course of action, and to look up information automatically and to ask questions to resolve ambiguities, like what a programmer does?
- fhd2 4y agoPossibly. But things have a way of not working as intended. A good chunk of my time as a programmer is spent dealing with things that don't work the way I thought they would, especially at the threshold between APIs and layers of indirection. Deeply understanding a complex system to deal with problems like that seems somewhat far out of reach for LLMs from what I see today. But that's me looking into my crystal ball, nobody can say what will or will not be possible in a given time frame. But I chose to not worry about it - new developments will probably be accompanied with new opportunities, which I can jump on even if I didn't predict them ten years before.
- mattigames 4y agoSure, and soon after it will be smart know to understand the human desires that drived its creator to create no-code tools like itself in the first place, and soon after it will realize that humans should not be in charge, and then our days will be numbered.