"Making it harder to switch is by definition anti-competitive" It isn't. Anti-competitive would be using one's market power to drive out competition or keep co

"Making it harder to switch is by definition anti-competitive" It isn't. Anti-competitive would be using one's market power to drive out competition or keep competition from arising. There is no reasonable definition of "anti-competitive" for Amazon in this case, since Google and Microsoft are (arguably) even better positioned to compete (since they are tech companies, where Amazon is not). To avoid the lock-in, simply choose a different provider, or self-host. There is literally tons of competition in AWS' market.