4 ms·
Thanks, I was there million years ag^W^W^W. I've seen a couple of times when people used drag-n-drop for the batch writing, but that was because they were tota
by justsomehnguy 4y ago
Thanks, I was there million years ag^W^W^W.
I've seen a couple of times when people used drag-n-drop for the batch writing, but that was because they were totally clueless about how you should write data on compact disks. *grin*
> became cheap and ubiquitous
yes
> and larger!
No. Refer to [0] for a remainder on how large and fast they were. And that is 2005. Sure, by 2008 anyone who wanted or needed could had a 8/16GB one, but between 2001 of the spec, 2003 of the doc and 2008 there are 5-7 years.
NB I worked as L1+ tech at that time and I had a CD-R with Ghost'ed WinXP, specifically so I could install it on an ancient PCs without a DVD drive. By 2008 my tools were on a bootable thumbdrive and I no longer took a 30+ CD case with me on a regular basis.
[0] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2005/04/flash2005/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2005/04/flash2005/
I also like what they tested bundled software and reported how much memory those program use in the RAM.
- TylerE 4y ago512MB is larger. I spent my college years (circa 2000) toting a 32mb drive around.
- justsomehnguy 4y ago> 512MB is larger I'm talking about CDs. And my memory isn't that bad (yet) to forgot 620/650/700MB capacity.