4 ms·
Linking to the proprietary websites would be forcing something on others, not linking to user-respecting mirrors.
by MiguelX413 4y ago
Linking to the proprietary websites would be forcing something on others, not linking to user-respecting mirrors.
- nailer 4y agoThis doesn't seem like a mirror - it has it's own weird branding. I'd be cool with a mirror.
- MiguelX413 4y agoWell, it is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- nailer 4y agoNope. A mirror reflects the source. Here's an actual mirror: https://archive.is/VWtHb https://archive.is/VWtHb
- MiguelX413 4y agoI see, what category would nitter and other similar services be then?
- nailer 4y agoI don’t know what nitter is.
- MiguelX413 4y agohttps://github.com/zedeus/nitter https://github.com/zedeus/nitter
- INTPenis 4y agoNot really. Did you see what I wrote? I have my own nitter instance, I use it regularly. But it's on my terms, when I see a twitter link I can replace it with my nitter instance. Forcing your own nitter instance on others and not letting them make their own decision is absolutely forcing something on others.