3 ms·
I'm enjoying the article, but this line is comically false: > noone bashed string theory for failing to make useful predictions
by superb-owl 4y ago
I'm enjoying the article, but this line is comically false:
> noone bashed string theory for failing to make useful predictions
- diyseguy 4y agonot to mention the "moist interesting category-theoretical concepts"
- Koshkin 4y agoSpeaking of those - they are not even mentioned in the text (yet), but without them any presentation of CT will seem necessarily dry: natural transformations and equivalence; adjunctions; and, of course, monads (them being monoids in the category of endofunctors notwithstanding).