Partway through the article the author reveals they are primarily angry about vaccines and masking, not surveillance. They also quote Ian Miles Cheong. This is

Partway through the article the author reveals they are primarily angry about vaccines and masking, not surveillance. They also quote Ian Miles Cheong. This is an entrance to a far-right pipeline, whether the author intends that or not. I find the complaint hypocritical, they're trying to "nudge" the readers themselves. Though I do agree with parts, the conspiratorial thinking made me lose interest in reading the whole thing.