3 ms·

I mean you're ignoring an obvious trend. These LLMs are improving rapidly. If the improvement continues, the LLMs can reach a point in skill where they can rep

I mean you're ignoring an obvious trend. These LLMs are improving rapidly. If the improvement continues, the LLMs can reach a point in skill where they can replace us. Your statement and this article is gambling on the status quo. That humans will always be better then AI. Why is this causing so much of a ruckus right now? Pretty much everyone knows chatGPT is pretty stupid when compared to a human. It's causing a ruckus because it's a herald for a possible future where the AI becomes superior to human problem solving. It's not a unrealistic proposition given that chess AI and go AI has already surpassed us.

oska 4y ago
Using the achievements of machine learning (not 'AI') in chess and go, which are created, constrained game spaces, to tout the promise of 'a possible future where the AI becomes superior to human problem solving' is either the spruiking of a fraudster or the rantings of a fantasist.
- HervalFreire 4y ago
  Constrained game lol? You know arithmetic isn't constrained right? Computers can fucking beat us in arithmetic without even implementing an AI or utilizing machine learning. Let me put it bluntly.. you have to be a literal idiot to think a "constrained game" is a factor here. Not only that.. your argument in itself is self defeating EVEN if "constrained games" WAS a factor. A machine learning system beat the best human humanity had to offer at a game that is fucking constrained? Literally, the more pathetically simplistic the task the worse Humans perform against an AI. That's the overall logic of your genius argument. I think one thing is proven by your response. That basically certain people are just not smart or intelligent. You're pretty much below average. This isn't an insult. I'm just pointing out the truth here. I'm sorry but you can't even come up with a coherent argument against the "rantings of a fraudster." Consider measuring your IQ to verify.
  - lboyd 4y ago
    Wow, straight off the deep end.

oska 4y ago

Using the achievements of machine learning (not 'AI') in chess and go, which are created, constrained game spaces, to tout the promise of 'a possible future where the AI becomes superior to human problem solving' is either the spruiking of a fraudster or the rantings of a fantasist.

HervalFreire 4y ago
Constrained game lol? You know arithmetic isn't constrained right? Computers can fucking beat us in arithmetic without even implementing an AI or utilizing machine learning. Let me put it bluntly.. you have to be a literal idiot to think a "constrained game" is a factor here. Not only that.. your argument in itself is self defeating EVEN if "constrained games" WAS a factor. A machine learning system beat the best human humanity had to offer at a game that is fucking constrained? Literally, the more pathetically simplistic the task the worse Humans perform against an AI. That's the overall logic of your genius argument. I think one thing is proven by your response. That basically certain people are just not smart or intelligent. You're pretty much below average. This isn't an insult. I'm just pointing out the truth here. I'm sorry but you can't even come up with a coherent argument against the "rantings of a fraudster." Consider measuring your IQ to verify.
- lboyd 4y ago
  Wow, straight off the deep end.