2 ms·
I started watching an interview with McGilchrist about the work in question, there was no physics, just a boatload of philosophy. It turns out I don't need phy
by mikewarot 4y ago
I started watching an interview with McGilchrist about the work in question, there was no physics, just a boatload of philosophy.
It turns out I don't need physics to be interpretable, just a workable predictive tool.
- didericis 4y agoFair enough. According to his thesis, the metaphysics/philosophy aspect of this stuff is in a right hemisphere bucket. While there may be reason to meditate on that if you’re a researcher wanting to gain better intuition, if you want to use physics as a tool, the aspects useful to the left hemisphere are all you need/the thesis is irrelevant.