3 ms·
Great idea! We do have 3 DoF magnetorquers on board, but I feel like the difference between shield on and shield off might need a very sensitive and directional
by picture 4y ago
Great idea! We do have 3 DoF magnetorquers on board, but I feel like the difference between shield on and shield off might need a very sensitive and directional detector..
- defrost 4y agoIt's a timing thing - Australia used a "we built it ourselves" detector with shielding that rotated about the crystal pack to find that missing mining source that hit the news last month. The detector part (doped crystals + scintillation sensors) is fundamentally undirectional - those pesky gamma come in from any direction. One side has to be shielded to bias the reading (use Tungsten perhaps) .. and by rotating the entire satellite the shielding direction changes - you now have a bulk data stats analysis challenge, do particular orientations align with counts (at various energy levels) rising or falling. As alway, have a fiddle with a ground based setup first.
- dylan604 4y ago>As alway, have a fiddle with a ground based setup first. now see, if we do that, then you're ruining the one chance I have of being the exact right person to go to space to fix the thing.
- azalemeth 4y agoI feel obliged to mention coded apertures here too! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coded_aperture https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coded_aperture