3 ms·

Well, I strongly disagree with the "that's it" part. The fad diets are what actually works. If it's the right fad ;) I'd argue permanent weight loss is primary

Well, I strongly disagree with the "that's it" part. The fad diets are what actually works. If it's the right fad ;) I'd argue permanent weight loss is primary a function of if the diet works, and most don't. Including "not overeating - that's it." There's a reason people overeat and it's not mental. Their satiety/energy system is broken.

frosted-flakes 4y ago
Ah, I see why you disagree: if I'd read to the end of the article I would have seen that you are trying to push your own fad diet. Whipped cream for dinner? No thanks. [1] People overeat because they've developed habits and routines over years or decades that allow them to do so. Permanent weight loss is all about breaking those habits and changing routines so that overeating isn't normal anymore. [1] You list a daily caloric intake of 2300 calories for your fad diet, which is a normal amount and a good number to aim for. Weight loss will be slow, but slow and consistent is good, as you've discovered.
- exfatloss 4y ago
  My weight loss has been 49lbs in ~6 months on this diet. That's slightly better than most reports of Ozempic. Fast and consistent is good :) Why go slow if you know how to go fast? You're simply wrong about weight loss. That's not how it works.
  - frosted-flakes 4y ago
    My point is that you would likely lose the same weight no matter what you ate, as long as you didn't overeat. There's nothing special about whipped cream, ground beef, and tomatoes. If you started at 290 lb (wild assumption) while eating 4000 calories/day, losing 49 lbs in 6 months by only eating 2300 calories/day is slow and consistent. But once you start approaching your target weight, progress will appear to slow down.
    - exfatloss 4y ago
      I don't think I could've sustained such an enormous caloric deficit (about 1,000kcal/day!) for as long. "As long as you don't overeat" is like "assume a can opener." If we knew how to not overeat we wouldn't have an obesity epidemic on our hands. That's the whole reason "don't overeat" is not useful dietary advice whereas "eat lots of cream" is.

frosted-flakes 4y ago

Ah, I see why you disagree: if I'd read to the end of the article I would have seen that you are trying to push your own fad diet. Whipped cream for dinner? No thanks. [1] People overeat because they've developed habits and routines over years or decades that allow them to do so. Permanent weight loss is all about breaking those habits and changing routines so that overeating isn't normal anymore. [1] You list a daily caloric intake of 2300 calories for your fad diet, which is a normal amount and a good number to aim for. Weight loss will be slow, but slow and consistent is good, as you've discovered.

exfatloss 4y ago
My weight loss has been 49lbs in ~6 months on this diet. That's slightly better than most reports of Ozempic. Fast and consistent is good :) Why go slow if you know how to go fast? You're simply wrong about weight loss. That's not how it works.
- frosted-flakes 4y ago
  My point is that you would likely lose the same weight no matter what you ate, as long as you didn't overeat. There's nothing special about whipped cream, ground beef, and tomatoes. If you started at 290 lb (wild assumption) while eating 4000 calories/day, losing 49 lbs in 6 months by only eating 2300 calories/day is slow and consistent. But once you start approaching your target weight, progress will appear to slow down.
  - exfatloss 4y ago
    I don't think I could've sustained such an enormous caloric deficit (about 1,000kcal/day!) for as long. "As long as you don't overeat" is like "assume a can opener." If we knew how to not overeat we wouldn't have an obesity epidemic on our hands. That's the whole reason "don't overeat" is not useful dietary advice whereas "eat lots of cream" is.