4 ms·
Intentionally engineering features that make a pathogen more dangerous (whether or not that's the origin story of SARS-CoV-2) is not the same thing as putting a
by jMyles 4y ago
Intentionally engineering features that make a pathogen more dangerous (whether or not that's the origin story of SARS-CoV-2) is not the same thing as putting antlers on a mouse. Or even putting antlers on a human.
Electricity is wonderful for lighting our homes, powering our thinking machines, and talking to each other over vast distances using radio. That doesn't mean it's OK for some rent-seeking asshole company to make electric torture devices and hand them out to the cops.
Likewise, genetic engineering can be useful, and fun, and productive, and insightful. It can also be murderous. The former don't per se imply the latter.
Not everything needs to be weaponized. And some things need not to be.
- UncleEntity 4y ago> Not everything needs to be weaponized. And some things need not to be. And some things need not be done at all. Could you imagine being a being with human level intelligence but trapped in a pig’s body, because science? Or The Island of Doctor Moreau as a warning and not a playbook of “things I want to do with my career”.
- antlerguyno1 4y agoIf it would help me to postpone old age by 200 years, I would gladly accept antlers. It's just bone, so I could always just saw them off if they get in the way