Is that different than what LLaMA would already give? I suppose redistributing "harmful things" is still bad, but if it's roughly equivalent to what's already o

Is that different than what LLaMA would already give? I suppose redistributing "harmful things" is still bad, but if it's roughly equivalent to what's already out there i struggle to think it's worth pulling. Side question, how is this a surprise to them? If this was due to safeguards, then pulling it now implies there's some new form of information. What new information could occur? That people were going to use it to generate a bunch of harmful contents? Seems obvious.. wonder what we're missing