4 ms·
> But since it is so highly trained you can mistake it for a master if you squint and don't look into what it is doing. But it is a master, as has been pointed
by ogogmad 4y ago
> But since it is so highly trained you can mistake it for a master if you squint and don't look into what it is doing.
But it is a master, as has been pointed out repeatedly. If you replace all illegal moves with resignations, and use the same style of prompt as the OP did, then it plays like an expert. I'm objecting because you're making it sound like it's a trivial result.
- Jensson 4y ago> you're making this sound like it's a trivial result I don't think this is a trivial result, emulating a highly trained idiot is still very impressive. But it is very different from an untrained genius.
- ogogmad 4y agoYou seem to have very rigid and boring definitions of the words "idiot" and "genius". The "AI effect" is real: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect Tbh, I don't even know what you're saying. [edit] OK, I might have misunderstood you. It's not always clear what people mean.
- Jensson 4y ago> The "AI effect" is real: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect That isn't relevant to my comment, an idiot human is still a human. Your comment here therefore doesn't make sense. The comment I responded to likened it to a genius entering a new field, I objected to that, that is all.