3 ms·
Given that Alpaca violated the TOS of both services, this is not surprising. It could also have been Stanford’s legal office trying to preempt a lawsuit, or a
by russellbeattie 4y ago
Given that Alpaca violated the TOS of both services, this is not surprising.
It could also have been Stanford’s legal office trying to preempt a lawsuit, or a “friendly” email from one of the companies expressing displeasure and pointing out Stanford’s liability. So more of a veiled threat rather than an official one.
Either way, the toothpaste is out of the tube. We now know that a model’s training can essentially be copied using the model itself cheaply. Now that the team at Stanford showed it was possible, and how relatively easy it was, it will bound to be copied everywhere.
- rdtsc 4y agoThat could be a sneaky strategy by competitors -- make the service say something naughty or illegal then call the media with screenshots and act very offended by it.
- syntaxfree 4y agoYou can make any page say anything by messing in the Developer pane.
- 3np 4y ago> Given that Alpaca violated the TOS of both services, this is not surprising. I don't think so? They are not competing.
- adt 4y agoOpenAI Terms of Use (14/Mar/2023) 2. Usage Requirements c. Restrictions You may not (iii) use output from the Services to develop models that compete with OpenAI; https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use https://openai.com/policies/terms-of-use